Unless I'm missing something, min-width, max-width, and max-height don't seem to be working for replaced elements (at least when display is block, I think inline too). See the above test page, where the sizes of the images should be as described.

The results for positioned elements are slightly different, and I'm not completely sure what's happening, but it's wrong...(unless the test page is wrong).

Test case for heights (not as carefully checked as the one for widths): http://www.fas.harvard.edu/~dbaron/css/test/sec1007b

That's a problem with the block code. You need to apply the min/max values _after_ reflowing the block element if it's replaced

min/max-width is part of css2 therefore this is a feature request...

So which test case doesn't work? Can you attach a simpler one that demonstrates the precise bug? My testing didn't show a problem otherwise I wouldn't ask.

In the URL in the URL field, http://www.fas.harvard.edu/~dbaron/css/test/sec1004b , almost all of the tests with images fail.

Could you quantify "almost"? Pretty please? It would really help...

If I number the images (and only images!), then the following are NOT failing: 4, 10 (out of 24). But 16, 21, and 22 are failing differently, by clipping instead of resizing. They're among the absolute positioning ones.

gracias

Fixed. Image elements now properly support min/max width/height. There are probably other elements that don't support them (e.g. form elements). If this is the case, please assign the bug to the correct owner (not me!). Thanks.

Verified fixed Linux apprunner 1999-11-12-15-M12. Remaining issues in bug 18477.