Closed Bug 1091 Opened 26 years ago Closed 24 years ago

css overflow property and event handling, rendering, clipping

Categories

(Core :: Layout, defect, P2)

x86
Windows NT
defect

Tracking

()

VERIFIED INVALID

People

(Reporter: kipp, Assigned: buster)

Details

Attachments

(1 file)

and cursor handling too we need to determine how to best handle children that are outside their parent for all othe above systems.
Status: NEW → ASSIGNED
Setting all current Open/Normal to M4.
per leger, assigning QA contacts to all open bugs without QA contacts according to list at http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/describecomponents.cgi?product=Browser
Status: ASSIGNED → RESOLVED
Closed: 26 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
This was a programmers note; the implementation is there and there are other bugs covering the edge case issues in the implementation. So I'm getting rid of this bug note to myself.
Status: RESOLVED → VERIFIED
As of M18 (2000080113) it is still broken. test url : http://qfg.virtualave.net/test.html Im running Linux - Red Hat 7.0beta (6.9-pinstripe) on a 586 and asa checked it (also not functioning) on WinNT.
Status: VERIFIED → REOPENED
Resolution: FIXED → ---
assigning to karnaze
Assignee: buster → karnaze
Status: REOPENED → NEW
this bug is M6, we need to decide weather we are going to do anything with it in the near future, or future the bug.
Buster, the url involves overflow:auto on a <p>. Back to you.
Assignee: karnaze → buster
Is p considered a block-level or replaced element? If it is then its a CSS2 standards complience issue and should be fixed otherwise, invalid. More information at http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-CSS2/visufx.html
Changing QA contact
QA Contact: petersen → chrisd
this bug is invalid. overflow doesn't have any meaning on boxes that do not have specified width and height. IE 5.5 on WinNT interprets the spec the same way. I'll attach a test case to show what I mean, derived from the test case mentioned in the bug description.
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 26 years ago24 years ago
Resolution: --- → INVALID
Netscape's standard compliance QA team reorganised itself once again, so taking remaining non-tables style bugs. Sorry about the spam. I tried to get this done directly at the database level, but apparently that is "not easy because of the shadow db", "plus it screws up the audit trail", so no can do...
QA Contact: chrisd → ian
Status: RESOLVED → VERIFIED
You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.

Attachment

General

Creator:
Created:
Updated:
Size: