Closed
Bug 1146
Opened 26 years ago
Closed 26 years ago
the DOM memory leak is enourmous...
Categories
(Core :: DOM: Core & HTML, defect, P1)
Tracking
()
CLOSED
INVALID
M4
People
(Reporter: jty, Assigned: vidur)
References
()
Details
(Whiteboard: 4/9: Requested reporter to verify)
When using the DOM way of accessing the document, i get _huge_ memory
leaks of over 170 megabytes, but when the HTML is something called
'well formed' (XML term), it leaks less, but still it leaks unbelieavably much.
Assignee | ||
Updated•26 years ago
|
Status: NEW → ASSIGNED
Assignee | ||
Comment 1•26 years ago
|
||
I haven't run purify in the last week or so, but prior to that I didn't see
"enormous" memory leaks. I'll try again in the next couple of days, but please
provide a test case. Since not much has changed in the last week, I don't think
I will see the leak that you mention with my DOM tests.
Here are the test cases, I had to modify them not to include some private book-
marks, but the leak is still big.
Priority: P2 → P1
Summary: the DOM memory leak is enourmous... → ss:the DOM memory leak is enourmous...
Assignee | ||
Updated•26 years ago
|
Summary: ss:the DOM memory leak is enourmous... → the DOM memory leak is enourmous...
Assignee | ||
Comment 4•26 years ago
|
||
This is not a ss bug. I'm looking into it, but the DOM as a whole is not the
cause of memory leaks in the general case. I'm taking it off the ss: radar.
Comment 6•26 years ago
|
||
per leger, assigning QA contacts to all open bugs without QA contacts according
to list at http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/describecomponents.cgi?product=Browser
Assignee | ||
Updated•26 years ago
|
Status: ASSIGNED → RESOLVED
Closed: 26 years ago
Resolution: --- → INVALID
Assignee | ||
Comment 7•26 years ago
|
||
Still trying to create the memory leak and I can't. There is a problem with the
testcast, however: the function processChildren() references
node.lastChild.nodeType even if node is a Text node. The value of node.lastChild
in this case would be null and the attempt to get the nodeType property fails.
This is a fairly old bug, so I'd like to assume that any earlier problems seen
have been resolved. Please tell me if this is no longer true.
jty, please verify resolution is correct. Otherwise I'll have to close this bug.
Comment 10•20 years ago
|
||
Revised delivery date 07/21
Updated•6 years ago
|
Component: DOM → DOM: Core & HTML
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•