We should eliminate the NS_COMFALSE madness once and for all. Here's a list of offending uses in your module -- please pass the bug along if there's someone else who should deal with it. widget/src/xpwidgets/nsBaseWidget.cpp: View change log or Blame annotations line 566

I don't know anything about this. I've never written any code in this file.

I looked up the author, looks like Mike Judge.

yeah yeah we need to remove it since the javascript calls cant handle it. thats fine but I dont think i will get to this anytime soon seeing how pervasive the use of nsIEnumerators are now. the nsIBasicEnumerator is a "basic" version of a javascript happy interface that should be usable. if anyone REALLY needs this change then lets start a client wide acknowlegement to use nsIEnumerator2 for example.

Based on mike's comments, marking as verified won't fix.

If no one minds, I'll fix this after beta. There is a client-wide move toward nsISimpleEnumerator, it's been all over the xpcom newsgroup and in the mozilla architecture meeting. It isn't going to get constant fanfare, but it has already happened to a great degree (query bugzilla for resolved bugs to do with NS_COMFALSE). The mailnews guys have done much great work. Why stop short of completion? /be

Good. We should get rid of all this crap like NS_COMFALSE and nsIEnumerator. I'm glad someone's doing it.

I think braddr is driving this to a good conclusion throughout the tree. /be

Since this cleanup task is not an M15 stability blocker, I'm pushing it off to M16 (to help allow us to branch for M15).

NS_COMFALSE is no longer in /widget/src/xpwidgets/nsbasewidget.cpp Search shows NO listing for NS_COMFALSE in /widget branch This bug can be resolved fixed.

M16 has been out for a while now, these bugs target milestones need to be updated.

Moving out a few milestones.

Milestone 0.8 has been released. We should either resolve this bug or update its milestone.

Moving to XP Toolkit/Widgets component.

I think this one was fixed long ago, so could we close it now ? and perhaps #11592, #11595 and some more in #8929... /jc

i count 20 users that usually doesn't match my definition of eliminate (it might match decimate but ...)

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 8929 ***

v