Closed
Bug 12109
Opened 25 years ago
Closed 25 years ago
"background-repeat: no-repeat" messes up transparency
Categories
(Core :: Layout, defect, P3)
Tracking
()
VERIFIED
FIXED
People
(Reporter: alexo, Assigned: troy)
References
Details
Attachments
(4 files)
In the following page, the TD element has a style tag which sets
"background-image" to a specific GIF. This GIF contains transparency.
The BODY tag also has a background image. Normally, the BODY background
appears through the transparent portions of the TD background. However,
if the "background-repeat" CSS attribute of the TD is set to "no-repeat",
then the transparent portions of "AntiqueButton.GIF" appear as just plain
white. So this page appears differently on Navigator 4.0 and my Mozilla
M8 build.
<html>
<head>
<title>Bugzilla Sample</title>
</head>
<body text="#FFFFFF" background="AntiqueBackground.GIF">
<table>
<tr>
<td width="80" height="50"
style="background-image:url(AntiqueButton.GIF);
background-repeat:no-repeat">Text
</td>
</tr>
</table>
</body>
</html>
I see an attachment for the button image (I assume that is AntiqueButton.GIF),
but what about the background image (AntiqueBackground.GIF)?
Comment 4•25 years ago
|
||
Comment 5•25 years ago
|
||
David, thanks for the even simpler test case that shows it's not related to
tables.
Status: ASSIGNED → RESOLVED
Closed: 25 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Fixed. The problem was we were always rendering the background color if there
was a background image that wasn't tiled to cover the entire frame bounds
Updated•25 years ago
|
Status: RESOLVED → VERIFIED
Comment 8•25 years ago
|
||
With the Windows Aug 26th build , the problem is fixed.
Updated•25 years ago
|
Status: VERIFIED → REOPENED
Why was this bug reopened? The QA contact confirmed it's been fixed...
Status: ASSIGNED → RESOLVED
Closed: 25 years ago → 25 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Updated•25 years ago
|
Status: RESOLVED → VERIFIED
Comment 10•25 years ago
|
||
I don't why this was reopened either. With the Sept 2nd Build (1999090208), the
problem is fixed.
Comment 11•25 years ago
|
||
*** Bug 15349 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•