Open
Bug 122387
Opened 23 years ago
Updated 2 years ago
Additional XUL namespace for new, non-xul1.0 widgets
Categories
(Core :: XUL, defect)
Tracking
()
NEW
Future
People
(Reporter: doronr, Unassigned)
References
Details
I remember Hyatt talking about this on irc sometime ago. A 2nd xul namespace
for new widgets, such as my <expander> and whatnot which won't make it into the
xul1.0 spec but which would be usefull in the product.
sballard suggests "/keymaster/gatekeeper/actually.theres.also.xul2"
Comment 1•23 years ago
|
||
I prefer `lets.hope.we.never.reach.xul2'
Comment 2•23 years ago
|
||
Surely the new URL should be based on the baddie's name in Ghostbusters II :-)
Comment 3•23 years ago
|
||
... which seems, after a bit of searching imdb, to be "vigo"
Updated•23 years ago
|
Status: NEW → ASSIGNED
Target Milestone: --- → Future
Comment 4•23 years ago
|
||
Why bother with a new namespace when XUL1.0 isn't final or even implemented
fully anyway?
Comment 5•23 years ago
|
||
doron says the <disclosure> stuff depends on this, marking dependency
Blocks: 85045
Comment 6•23 years ago
|
||
I don't recall the exact words, but I think the quote where xul told
them to choose the form of the one who would come to destroy them
might work for this. Something along the lines of
http://www.mozilla.org/keymaster/gatekeeper/choose.the.form.of.the.destroyer
or however the quote went.
Unfortunately, this lacks the elegance of ending in the xul extension.
If that is strongly desirable, then maybe something more like
http://www.mozilla.org/keymaster/gatekeeper/there.is.still.only.xul
Component: XP Toolkit/Widgets: XUL → XUL
QA Contact: jrgmorrison → xptoolkit.widgets
Updated•15 years ago
|
Assignee: hyatt → nobody
Updated•15 years ago
|
Status: ASSIGNED → NEW
Updated•2 years ago
|
Severity: minor → S4
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•