compare the page against the bitmap "correct" layout provided on this page.

Steve could you explain to me about the problem. Thanx

reassigning to Kipp. The style context for each element looks correct, but they make use of negative margins.

I don't see anything wrong with the page

the page uses negative margins to overlap the ~ 1 ~ to get a drop-shadow effect. The bitmap for what the page should look like seems to be missing : ( Maybe the author could be asked for it. If you see each ~1~ duplicated, the pages isn't correct. that's what I see with today's build. Back in Nov. peter looked at this page with me and agreed it was the existence of negative margins that was the main culprit.

Well I dug in furthur and here is what I found. 1. The page has now STYLE tags or LINK tags pointing to a style sheet so it's no longer a good test if it ever was. Because of this, the layout I see in nglayout, ie5 and navigator all agree and we have no problem. 2. However, the page doesn't load correctly because the process-script-tag code flushes out any pending tags before the script runs in case the script needs access to the objects previously defined. Commenting this out causes the page to load properly.

Fixed the script flushing problem. We don't reflow until the content model is coherent.

marking verified