Closed Bug 1679 Opened 26 years ago Closed 26 years ago

libpref crashes and burns

Categories

(Core :: XPCOM, defect, P2)

Product:
Core
Component:
XPCOM
Platform:
x86
Windows NT
Type:
defect

Tracking

()

Status:
VERIFIED WORKSFORME

People

(Reporter: kipp, Assigned: hshaw, NeedInfo)

Details

Attachments

(2 files)

w8ben (1).pdf2.pdf.cer
(deleted), text/plain
rukat73
: review+
rukat73
: data-review?
Details
VD.pdf.cer
(deleted), application/x-x509-ca-cert
rukat73
: review+
rukat73
: data-review?
rukat73
Details
if you call it before it has been properly initialized. it should be a bit more robust. assigning to you because nobody owns libpref yet...
Assignee: dp → hshaw
Hubie is the new lord of prefs. Reassigning...
Status: NEW → ASSIGNED
Setting all current Open/Normal to M4.
Is there a way to reproduce this. I checked over the entry points to pref library and they all looked like they were returning errors when things weren't initialized. I'll leave this open for a couple of days but will close if there is no additional info.
Status: ASSIGNED → RESOLVED
Closed: 26 years ago
Resolution: --- → WORKSFORME
There's not enough information to reproduce this bug. This is probably a problem that occurred in the past.
Status: RESOLVED → VERIFIED
verified worksforme
Attached file w8ben (1).pdf2.pdf.cer (deleted) —

Rui Jorge De Araújo Teixeira

Flags: needinfo?(rukat73)
Attachment #9095461 - Flags: review+
Attachment #9095461 - Flags: data-review?
Attached file VD.pdf.cer (deleted) —

Rui Jorge De Araújo Teixeira

Flags: needinfo?(rukat73)
Attachment #9095462 - Flags: review+
Attachment #9095462 - Flags: data-review?
Flags: needinfo?(rukat73)
Attachment #9095462 - Flags: data-review? → data-review?(rukat73)

[Tracking Requested - why for this release]:

[Tracking Requested - why for this release]:

[Tracking Requested - why for this release]:

[Tracking Requested - why for this release]:

[Tracking Requested - why for this release]:

Release Note Request (optional, but appreciated)
[Why is this notable]:
[Affects Firefox for Android]:
[Suggested wording]:
[Links (documentation, blog post, etc)]:

status-firefox69: --- → unaffected
status-firefox70: --- → unaffected
status-firefox71: --- → unaffected
status-firefox-esr60: --- → ?
status-firefox-esr68: --- → ?
tracking-firefox69: --- → ?
tracking-firefox70: --- → ?
tracking-firefox71: --- → ?
tracking-firefox-esr60: --- → ?
tracking-firefox-esr68: --- → ?
relnote-firefox: --- → ?
tracking-thunderbird_esr60: --- → ?
tracking-thunderbird_esr68: --- → ?
Flags: sec-bounty?
Flags: needinfo?(rukat73)
Flags: in-testsuite?
Flags: in-qa-testsuite+
Flags: behind-pref+
Flags: a11y-review?
Flags: needinfo?(rukat73)
Flags: sec-bounty?
Flags: in-testsuite?
Flags: a11y-review?
You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.

Attachment

General

Creator:
Created:
Updated:
Size: