Closed
Bug 27134
Opened 25 years ago
Closed 11 years ago
dual license refers to but does not define "MPL"
Categories
(mozilla.org :: Licensing, task, P3)
mozilla.org
Licensing
Tracking
(Not tracked)
RESOLVED
WORKSFORME
People
(Reporter: bugzilla, Assigned: hecker)
References
()
Details
The final paragraph of the NPL+GPL dual license boilerplate refers to "NPL" but
nowhere in that boilerplate is "NPL" defined. Similarly, the MPL+GPL that the
security team has constructed from the boilerplate samples has the same problem
of using but not defining "MPL."
I believe the NPL boilerplate should be modified to begin:
The contents of this file are subject to the Netscape Public
License Version 1.1 (the "License" or "NPL"); [...]
and similarly the MPL boilerplate:
The contents of this file are subject to the Mozilla Public
License Version 1.1 (the "License" or "MPL"); [...]
Comment 2•24 years ago
|
||
This bug has not been touched for more than nine months. In most cases, that
means it has "slipped through the net". Please could the owner take a moment to
add a comment to the bug with current status, and/or close it.
Thank you :-)
Gerv
Comment 3•24 years ago
|
||
Still planning to address in the next MPL revision, whenever that is (!)
Comment 4•19 years ago
|
||
--> Licensing
Assignee: mitchell → hecker
Status: ASSIGNED → NEW
Component: Miscellaneous → Licensing
QA Contact: gerv
Comment 5•11 years ago
|
||
Since basically everything has migrated to MPL 2.0, this bug is probably INVALID now.
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 11 years ago
Resolution: --- → INVALID
Comment 6•11 years ago
|
||
Actually, more like WFM, since this looks like it was already done at some point.
Resolution: INVALID → WORKSFORME
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•