Closed Bug 27134 Opened 25 years ago Closed 11 years ago

dual license refers to but does not define "MPL"

Categories

(mozilla.org :: Licensing, task, P3)

Tracking

(Not tracked)

RESOLVED WORKSFORME

People

(Reporter: bugzilla, Assigned: hecker)

References

()

Details

The final paragraph of the NPL+GPL dual license boilerplate refers to "NPL" but nowhere in that boilerplate is "NPL" defined. Similarly, the MPL+GPL that the security team has constructed from the boilerplate samples has the same problem of using but not defining "MPL." I believe the NPL boilerplate should be modified to begin: The contents of this file are subject to the Netscape Public License Version 1.1 (the "License" or "NPL"); [...] and similarly the MPL boilerplate: The contents of this file are subject to the Mozilla Public License Version 1.1 (the "License" or "MPL"); [...]
will address in next MPL revision
Status: NEW → ASSIGNED
This bug has not been touched for more than nine months. In most cases, that means it has "slipped through the net". Please could the owner take a moment to add a comment to the bug with current status, and/or close it. Thank you :-) Gerv
Still planning to address in the next MPL revision, whenever that is (!)
--> Licensing
Assignee: mitchell → hecker
Status: ASSIGNED → NEW
Component: Miscellaneous → Licensing
QA Contact: gerv
Since basically everything has migrated to MPL 2.0, this bug is probably INVALID now.
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 11 years ago
Resolution: --- → INVALID
Actually, more like WFM, since this looks like it was already done at some point.
Resolution: INVALID → WORKSFORME
You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.