Closed
Bug 2977
Opened 26 years ago
Closed 25 years ago
Background color not displayed on for index watch table
Categories
(Core :: Layout, defect, P2)
Core
Layout
Tracking
()
M8
People
(Reporter: esther, Assigned: troy)
References
()
Details
Attachments
(1 file)
|
(deleted),
text/html
|
Details |
problem: background color for table index watch on right side of page not
displaying.
Found while doing the "top sites" checking. Using the latest seamonkey
builds available today 2/5.
|
||
Comment 1•26 years ago
|
||
per leger, assigning QA contacts to all open bugs without QA contacts according
to list at http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/describecomponents.cgi?product=Browser
Updating QA Contact. petersen...how does this look with latest apprunner?
|
||
Comment 3•26 years ago
|
||
Same problem as described. This happens with the March 10th AppRunner builds for
Mac, Windows, and Linux
|
||
Updated•26 years ago
|
Status: NEW → ASSIGNED
|
|
||
Updated•26 years ago
|
Target Milestone: M4 → M5
|
|
||
Comment 6•26 years ago
|
||
moving to M5
|
|
||
Updated•25 years ago
|
Target Milestone: M5 → M6
|
|
||
Comment 7•25 years ago
|
||
Moving to M6
|
|
||
Comment 8•25 years ago
|
||
Moving to M8
|
||
Comment 9•25 years ago
|
||
|
|
||
Comment 10•25 years ago
|
||
Test case is a simple page with <body background> and a <div> of width 700px.
Shows same bug.
|
|
||
Updated•25 years ago
|
Assignee: karnaze → kipp
Status: ASSIGNED → NEW
|
|
||
Comment 11•25 years ago
|
||
The test case involves an image on the body. Reassigning to Kipp.
|
||
Updated•25 years ago
|
Assignee: kipp → peterl
|
|
||
Comment 12•25 years ago
|
||
Background propogation bug. Taking this.
|
|
||
Comment 13•25 years ago
|
||
*** Bug 7558 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
|
|
||
Updated•25 years ago
|
Assignee: peterl → troy
|
|
||
Comment 14•25 years ago
|
||
Here's one of those background propogation issues we talked about. This is an
example of HTML background not stretching to fill the viewport.
|
Assignee | |
Comment 15•25 years ago
|
||
The problem is I think we're doing exactly what CSS2 says we should do
Per 10.3.3 we compute the HTML element's 'width' based on its containing block
width (the window width). That means the HTML element's box is only as wide as
the window. The content that overflows is 'visible', but the CSS spec says
background is only rendered over the content and padding areas of the box and
that means not in the overflow area.
What we used to do was to make the HTML element's width as wide as its
overflowed content. That meant the background color was displayed all the way
out.
That meant that we failed Ian's tests where he explicitly sets the 'width'
property and then checks that we do in fact use that value and do not extend the
width to include the overflowed content
Maybe there's a section (or should be a section) that distinguishes between an
explicit value for 'width' and 'auto', but I don't currently see such as section
|
||
Comment 16•25 years ago
|
||
CSS2 14.2 ( http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-CSS2/colors.html#q2 ) says:
The background of the box generated by the root element covers the entire
canvas.
I think Ian is working on updating some of his tests based on this statement.
Status: ASSIGNED → RESOLVED
Closed: 25 years ago
Resolution: --- → DUPLICATE
|
|
Assignee | |
Comment 17•25 years ago
|
||
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 7656 ***
|
|
||
Updated•25 years ago
|
Status: RESOLVED → VERIFIED
|
|
||
Comment 18•25 years ago
|
||
Agreed. This bug is a duplicate of 7656.
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•