Closed
Bug 3191
Opened 26 years ago
Closed 25 years ago
table column is truncated in build 02.19.99
Categories
(Core :: Layout: Tables, defect, P2)
Tracking
()
VERIFIED
FIXED
M9
People
(Reporter: andreww, Assigned: karnaze)
References
()
Details
(Whiteboard: [TESTCASE] handling of <td width="%"> (sic))
Attachments
(1 file)
(deleted),
text/html
|
Details |
When you go to this page in Gecko, look at the link listings - which are
truncated - then compare this to 4.5's view. Looks like the table cell column
is getting shortened
Comment 1•26 years ago
|
||
Parsing? or Tables? -- notice the <td width="%">
========= testcase -- derived from original URL =======
<html><head></head><body>
<!-- Feb 19 win 95 .. produces a tall, vertical table -->
<!-- NOTICE the TD: <td width="%"> -->
<!-- ...^ huh? -->
<!-- The UL/LI is not required; legacy of original URL -->
<table border>
<tr>
<td width="%">
<ul>
<li>blah blah blah blah blah blah blah
</ul>
</td>
</tr>
</table>
</body></html>
========= testcase =====================================
Assignee | ||
Updated•26 years ago
|
Status: NEW → ASSIGNED
Assignee | ||
Comment 2•26 years ago
|
||
We are treating width=% like width=0% and handling it differently than Nav4.5.
Assignee | ||
Updated•25 years ago
|
Target Milestone: M6
Assignee | ||
Comment 3•25 years ago
|
||
Moving to M6.
Assignee | ||
Comment 4•25 years ago
|
||
Moving to M8
Updated•25 years ago
|
Whiteboard: [TESTCASE]
Updated•25 years ago
|
Whiteboard: [TESTCASE] → [TESTCASE] handling of <td width="%"> (sic)
Assignee | ||
Comment 5•25 years ago
|
||
Moving to M9.
Comment 6•25 years ago
|
||
Comment 7•25 years ago
|
||
I just tested this on Windows 98 with M7 Apprunner and the test seems to pass.
Is this Win95 only or has it been fixed?
I do notice the search box in the original URL is getting pushed against the top
image. That may bee correct and Nav 4.6 may be wrong.
Assignee | ||
Updated•25 years ago
|
Status: ASSIGNED → RESOLVED
Closed: 25 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Assignee | ||
Comment 8•25 years ago
|
||
The original problem and test case look ok on WinNT debug. I don't notice the
problem reported in the 7/2 comments either.
Updated•25 years ago
|
Status: RESOLVED → VERIFIED
Comment 9•25 years ago
|
||
Using 8/5 Apprunner, verifying bug fixed.
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•