Closed
Bug 3250
Opened 26 years ago
Closed 26 years ago
configure check for glibc on Linux
Categories
(SeaMonkey :: Build Config, defect, P2)
Tracking
(Not tracked)
VERIFIED
FIXED
M7
People
(Reporter: mcafee, Assigned: briano)
Details
(Keywords: platform-parity)
Do we need a configure check for glibc to cover
the memory problem discussed in
http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3142 ?
Updated•26 years ago
|
Assignee: leaf → leaf
Assignee | ||
Updated•26 years ago
|
Status: NEW → ASSIGNED
Assignee | ||
Comment 2•26 years ago
|
||
This is fairly easy to do (I think) using 'gcc -E - -dM </dev/null'
and checking __GNUC__, but is it really needed? What's the background
on this bug? I've looked at bug 3142, but I still don't know what
this is all about. What compile macros needs to be set (or created)
based on the libc version?
Reporter | ||
Comment 3•26 years ago
|
||
glibc needs to be patched to avoid loading
dll's multiple times. We should detect this
patch at configure time if possible. Dp mailed
out to mozilla.builds about this.
Assignee | ||
Updated•26 years ago
|
OS: Solaris → Linux
Hardware: Sun → PC
Reporter | ||
Updated•26 years ago
|
Component: XP Utilities → Build Config
Reporter | ||
Comment 5•26 years ago
|
||
changing component to build config
Summary: configure check for glibc on Linux → [PP]configure check for glibc on Linux
All the information you need to do this is here in a detailed post I made to
n.p.m.unix a long time ago:
news://news.mozilla.org/36CDBBD4.C3D138FB%40netscape.com
news://news.mozilla.org/36CDBCE3.9643C1B3%40netscape.com
Assignee | ||
Updated•26 years ago
|
Target Milestone: M5 → M6
Assignee | ||
Comment 8•26 years ago
|
||
I can't get to this right now. I hope to do it before M6,
but I don't think it's important enough to delay M5.
Assignee | ||
Updated•26 years ago
|
Target Milestone: M6 → M7
Assignee | ||
Comment 10•26 years ago
|
||
I still don't have this working properly (as far as I can tell,
since I don't have any way to test it). Can someone point me
at a machine that has this problem (and hasn't been patched yet),
or tell me which glibc distributions have this bug (2.0.7? or
older ones?).
Reporter | ||
Comment 11•26 years ago
|
||
It looks like the following point release fixed the problem:
glibc-2.0.7-32
glibc-devel-2.0.7-32
and a straight install of RH5.2 installs
glibc-2.0.7-29
glibc-devel-2.0.7-29
the SparcLinux boxes probably have not been fixed,
telnet://sleestack has not, so you could test this there.
Comment 12•26 years ago
|
||
if this is fixed, who needs to verify and close this bug?
Assignee | ||
Updated•26 years ago
|
Status: ASSIGNED → RESOLVED
Closed: 26 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Assignee | ||
Comment 13•26 years ago
|
||
I just checked in a new Linux-only test for this in configure.
I made it non-fatal, such that it just spits out a message about
how upgrading glibc will benefit the user, and then continues
on like normal.
Let me know if it needs any tweaks.
Comment 14•24 years ago
|
||
vrfy
Status: RESOLVED → VERIFIED
Keywords: pp
Summary: [PP]configure check for glibc on Linux → configure check for glibc on Linux
Updated•20 years ago
|
Product: Browser → Seamonkey
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•