Build ID: 2000042008 Very strange, not quite sure what component this fits under. Black arrows that appear in the gray area of dropdowns/comboboxes work fine until visiting Disney.com. None of the arrows appear in the gray area (it's just a gray square) at the disney.com site, nor at any other site you visit after that as far as I can tell. I'll try to get some screenshots up soon...I can reproduce this every time, can anyone else?

Nevermind, this is strange...I think it's just a general problem with them, completely unrelated to disney.com. I'm now getting the problem in any combobox/dropdown at any site (or in the Preferences dialog) directly after loading Moz, without even doing anything beforehand. Is this XP?

Hmmmm, this works OK on WinNT.

Problem disappeared for awhile and is now back on 2000042608 on any site I visit. All HTML <SELECT>'s don't have the arrows displayed. nsbeta2?

In fact, XP dropdown arrows seem to be missing also on 2000042608. ccing trudelle and jrgm

Am I the only one who sees this problem? I'm surprised it hasn't been reported by anyone else yet

I'm working on getting a Win98 build on one of my machines instead of having to use QA's machine, hopefully I check this out today.

I can also see this on win95 (e.g., at http://www.mozilla.org/quality/help/bug-form.html)

*** Bug 37797 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Apparently, PatBlt doesn't work on Win98, reassigning

so pp, then?

PatBlt does not work on windows 98.. so I changed the type of background blit.

verify fixed on 2000050308

Problem is back (or I just never noticed this case) with 2000050608 win98. If you stop a page while it's loading and then click on a dropdown box, the arrows disappear. If you can't repro it, an easier way is to go to a page with <SELECT>'s (like www.betanews.com), wait til it's fully loaded, hit the reload button, immediately press stop, and click on a dropdown.

This is some other problem, not a background drawing problem anylonger. To you Rod..

This latter problem sounds like bug #28659 -- dup?

sure is *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 28659 ***

Verified duplicate.