Closed Bug 3901 Opened 26 years ago Closed 19 years ago

want ability to forward message/rfc822 attachments

Categories

(SeaMonkey :: MailNews: Message Display, enhancement, P3)

All
Windows NT
enhancement

Tracking

(Not tracked)

RESOLVED FIXED
Future

People

(Reporter: jgmyers, Unassigned)

References

(Blocks 1 open bug)

Details

(Keywords: helpwanted)

Consider a message, for example a bounce message, which has an imbedded message/rfc822. The user can click on the paperclip button, then double-click on the imbedded message/rfc822 to display the imbedded message. Unfortunately, the imbedded message cannot be forwarded. There should be some way to forward the imbedded message/rfc822, as if it were a top-level message.
Being able to do most of the other operations on the "Message" menu make sense. Reply, Edit as new, Copy, and Add to Addressbook. Move, Mark, and the Thread items would not make sense.
QA Contact: 4080 → 4114
Assignee: phil → rhp
Hmm. Maybe a libmime issue? -> rhp
Status: NEW → ASSIGNED
I'll put this on the list...could be a libmime issue, but I will have to investigate. - rhp
Target Milestone: M5
Target Milestone: M5 → M6
Won't get here before M5.
Target Milestone: M6 → M9
Enhancements will probably be later in the cycle.
Target Milestone: M9 → M12
Pushing enhancements out past B1. - rhp
I don't think this needs to be fixed for PR1
Target Milestone: M12 → M16
Target Milestone: M16 → M20
Moving to the helpwanted list
Assignee: rhp → nobody
Status: ASSIGNED → NEW
Keywords: helpwanted
Moving target milestone to "future" to be reviewed at a later time
Target Milestone: M20 → Future
Changing qa assigned to myself.
QA Contact: esther → pmock
Change QA from pmock to fenella
QA Contact: pmock → fenella
To Esther...
QA Contact: fenella → esther
See also bug 69359.
Do we seriously have to detach attachments from the incoming message and manually attach them to a forwarded message to include attachments in the forwarded message?? This is way annoying. Since we are nearing 1.0 can the importance of this "enhancement" be reconsidered?
Duplicate or related bugs: bug 3901 bug 11013 bug 34150 bug 55344 bug 69359
Depends on: 34150
QA Contact: esther → trix
Flags: blocking1.6b+
Flags: blocking1.6b+
Blocks: 204350
Product: Browser → Seamonkey
Blocks: 269826
No longer depends on: 269826
No longer blocks: 204350
Depends on: 204350
This has been fixed by the patch for bug 204350.
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 19 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
(In reply to comment #16) > This has been fixed by the patch for bug 204350. If this is fully fixed by 204350, then shouldn't bug 34150 be removed as blocker? Also, does Bug 11013 factor in?
(In reply to comment #17) > (In reply to comment #16) > > This has been fixed by the patch for bug 204350. > > If this is fully fixed by 204350, then shouldn't bug 34150 be removed as > blocker? Yep. > Also, does Bug 11013 factor in? No, that's unrelated.
No longer depends on: 34150
You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.