From Bugzilla Helper: BuildID: 20000052520 I have an editor page edit.cfm that POSTs a form to edit_proess.cfm. edit_process.cfm redirects back to edit.cfm (302 response). Edit.cfm is never refreshed, so the user cannot see the editions that they just made. Reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: The above URL is a testcase that I created.

I think that this is related to bug 39668 but I can't tell what that bug is actually about, so I created this one. I don't know whether this is officially a problem in the network layer, cache, or should be handled by the browser. It certainly blocks several major apps that I have developed, because this is a n editing technique that I use frequently. This is not a problem in any previous version of NS/IE from versions two.

confirmed with win32 build 062009 under NT. moved nsbeta2 keyword to keyword field for evaluation.

Putting on [nsbeta2+] radar for beta2 fix.

Reassigning to neeti

Something to help neeti test this-- I just checked in the changes to testserver. So if you have the server already up and running then update, build and make the following changes in your urlmap and run it again. -- * Change /redirect to set the Location as /post -- So you'd always redirect to the post start page. * Change the post.html file to submit to /redirect instead of / I have already made these changes locally for server running on http://status:4321/ So you can use that if you want (just go to http://status:4321/post for this bug)

I followed the steps gagan outlined above. I have tried this with and without enabling the cache. In both cases I get "Error loading URL http://status:4321/redirect" in the console window. Looks like it is not cache related. Ruslan, could you look into this? Thanks, Neeti

Per gagan's request, moving form [nsbeta2+] to [nsbeta2-]

*** Bug 45322 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Didn't we have a dup for this?

Dup of bug 41950?

Reassig to dp

This bugs cannot be reproduced until we fix 41950. Adding dependency. I dont think it is a dup though. We will see. Thanks Mats for the hint.

After reading 40658, YES it is a dup. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 41950 ***

verified DUP