Closed
Bug 40728
Opened 25 years ago
Closed 24 years ago
Remove structure phrases choices from prefs UI
Categories
(SeaMonkey :: MailNews: Message Display, defect, P3)
Tracking
(Not tracked)
VERIFIED
FIXED
M18
People
(Reporter: selmer, Assigned: scottputterman)
Details
(Whiteboard: [nsbeta2-][nsbeta3+])
The structured phrases conversions are too complicated to properly describe to
novice users and are primarily targetted at advanced newsgroup users. These
prefs should just have a default state and only advanced users can change them.
The affected pages are the preference panels for viewing and composing
messages. All the checkboxes and descriptions for these prefs should be
removed. (But don't take out the emoticon stuff, it's cute :-)
then where would these prefs go? I think jennifer spent a lot of time trying to
word the prefs and putting them in the prefs.
Lisa, they're just gone, not intending to be moved to another panel. Jennifer
has already updated the spec.
Assignee | ||
Updated•25 years ago
|
Status: NEW → ASSIGNED
Assignee | ||
Comment 3•25 years ago
|
||
nominating for nsbeta2. I think if we're going to remove these because they are
confusing users, we might as well do it before the next beta.
Keywords: nsbeta2
Target Milestone: --- → M17
Lisa, Simone and tried to think of a good way to write the text of this pref to
adequately describe the feature(s) to users. We couldn't really come up with
anything that really made it clear what the features were. In the process, the
mail team decided that this was a pretty advanced feature and exposing it to
average users wasn't the best idea. Instead, we will implement the most logical
behavior by default. Advanced users who want to change it can do so with the
hidden prefs.
I think we have a bug in bugscape on this since this will be for netscape
commercial only. http://bugscape.netscape.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1062
Comment 6•25 years ago
|
||
putting on nsbeta2+ radar. will become a minus after 6/15
Whiteboard: [nsbeta2+] 6/15
Comment 7•25 years ago
|
||
IMO, this is a DUP of bug 23582. My goal is to remove those prefs completely
from Mailnews and expose them once for the whole suite (including AIM and
browser).
We should go ahead and mark it a dup of the bug Ben mentions for mozilla. We
have the bugscape bug to track for netscape commercial.
Comment 9•25 years ago
|
||
Why do you think, Mozilla and Netscape 6 should differ? IMO, we should resort to
diversity only as the very last resort. Other vendors might have the same
concerns like Netscape.
Assignee | ||
Comment 10•24 years ago
|
||
We,as in Netscape, decided that we want to turn these preferences off by default
We also decided that these UI preferences were too confusing. This luckily
coincided with what I think is your belief that these preferences are
unnecessary (in the UI). Therefore we think taking them out of the Prefs ui
will make everyone happy. We are only turning these off by default in the
Netscape tree and are going to leave them on by default in mozilla as they
currently are.
Comment 11•24 years ago
|
||
It is completely fine with me, with one execption: Please leave the structured
phrases pref for display on. It does next to no harm (only adds style) and has
next to no false positives. I want people to understand me, when I write
*emphasis*.ote, that MS Word does the conversion during writing automatically
as well (i.e. if you type "*foo* ", "*foo*" is marked bold immediately).
Comment 12•24 years ago
|
||
IMO, this is an client/client interop issue.
I happend to write some user docs. You can find them at
<news://news.mozilla.org/3943878C.3050706@bucksch.org> (n.p.m.documentation,
"TXT<->HTML converters user doc"). (The notes about prefs and the "Note"
paragraph under "Using the HTML Composer" are irrelevant for NS6 now.) Maybe
they are sufficient and you are feeling better with turning on the display perf
then.
Comment 13•24 years ago
|
||
Cleaning up status whiteboard by marking beta2 minus (6/15 has passed)
I'm going ahead and nominating this for beta3. It is a shame we couldn't get
this simplification landed for beta2. I know that there are a lot of more
critical items on everyone's plate, and it is good that folks are focusing on
those blockers.
Keywords: nsbeta3
Whiteboard: [nsbeta2+] 6/15 → [nsbeta2-]
Comment 14•24 years ago
|
||
I'm not sure, my comments were understandable.
I think, the TXT->HTML recognition of structs should be on by default
Rationale:
The smily recognition is also on *and*
- the structs recognition is much less risky, because we only add style. The
failures are usually obvious (bold in C-comments or Unix-commands?). The smily
conversion, while generally being relatively safe, *replaces* the original
content, so the harm in the failure case is larger.
- the smily conversion is just "cute", because most Internet users know smilies.
The structs conversion can be really helpful, because many users don't know this
convention, but might recieve msgs using it.
I don't think, the structs conversion will really confuse people. After a few
instances, it should be possible to figure out the meaning. In addition to that,
we explain it in the help.
Comment 15•24 years ago
|
||
Ops, reread the bug. Is it correct that N6 will have the smily conversion
disabled by default?
I would prefer to have in enabled (of course, since I coded it), but would not
be violently against turning it off.
Of course, my smilies vs. structs deathmatch is bogus then, but the arguments
(helpful, while next to no harm) for enabling structs still apply, and I still
vote for that.
Whiteboard: [nsbeta2-] → [nsbeta2-][nsbetat3+]
Target Milestone: M17 → M18
Comment 16•24 years ago
|
||
+ per mail triage
Comment 17•24 years ago
|
||
correcting typo in status whiteboard
Whiteboard: [nsbeta2-][nsbetat3+] → [nsbeta2-][nsbeta3+]
Comment 18•24 years ago
|
||
Adding myself to cc: list (replacing Simone).
Assignee | ||
Comment 19•24 years ago
|
||
I left the smilies but removed the structured phrases pref. fix checked in.
Status: ASSIGNED → RESOLVED
Closed: 24 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Comment 20•24 years ago
|
||
Verified as fixed on win32, linux, and macos using the following builds:
win32 commercial seamonkey build 2000-092009-m18 installed on P500 Win98
linux commercial seamonkey build 2000-092008-m18 installed on P200 RedHat 6.2
macos commercial seamonkey build 2000-092008-m18 installed on G3/400 OS 9.04
Status: RESOLVED → VERIFIED
Updated•20 years ago
|
Product: Browser → Seamonkey
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•