Closed
Bug 4266
Opened 26 years ago
Closed 25 years ago
Layout error of XML document
Categories
(Core :: Layout, defect, P3)
Tracking
()
M15
People
(Reporter: johng, Assigned: buster)
References
()
Details
Attachments
(2 files)
Check out this XML page by Tim Bray and notice that the layout of the text to
the left of the 2nd text box ("Setting Your Server Up for XML") is wrong.
Specifically, there is no text there at all - it begins below this right
justified box, which is not the intent.
I'm using Netscape build 0324, viewer, on Win95
Nisheeth, can you take a look and determine whether it's an XML problem or just
a regular oldlayout problem. If it's a regular layout problem, a small sample
would help
Comment 2•26 years ago
|
||
I'll let Nisheeth look into it further, but it looks like a layout problem to
me.
Updated•26 years ago
|
Status: NEW → ASSIGNED
Target Milestone: M4
Comment 3•26 years ago
|
||
Accepting bug and setting milestone to M4...
Updated•26 years ago
|
Target Milestone: M4 → M5
Comment 4•26 years ago
|
||
Moving bug to M5...
Updated•25 years ago
|
Assignee: nisheeth → kipp
Status: ASSIGNED → NEW
Target Milestone: M5 → M6
Comment 5•25 years ago
|
||
So, this is definitely a layout problem. I've reduced the test case to its bare
minimum and am attaching it to this bug report. Re-assigning this to Kipp and
setting target milestone to M6.
If you load the test case up in IE5 and compare with viewer, you'll notice that,
for some reason, there is extra vertical whitespace between the "Next Title" and
the "First Title" sections.
Comment 6•25 years ago
|
||
Comment 7•25 years ago
|
||
Severity: normal → minor
Status: NEW → ASSIGNED
Target Milestone: M6 → M15
Status: ASSIGNED → RESOLVED
Closed: 25 years ago
Resolution: --- → DUPLICATE
The simplified test case works as expected; there are no errors in how we
render. "Next Title" is below the "This is a test" text which has a 5pt bottom
margin (approximate 3 pixels).
The larger test case demonstrates what I call an "ib" bug - a block element that
is a child of an inline element. Tim's style sheet doesn't define anything for
"div1" therefore its "inline". I already have several bugs opened up to cover
this case so I'm dup'ing this one.
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 4814 ***
Updated•25 years ago
|
QA Contact: 4144 → 4110
Updated•25 years ago
|
Status: RESOLVED → VERIFIED
Comment 9•25 years ago
|
||
Verifying this a dup of #4814 in regards to the issue of a block element
that is a child of an inline element.
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•