Closed Bug 4266 Opened 26 years ago Closed 25 years ago

Layout error of XML document

Categories

(Core :: Layout, defect, P3)

x86
Windows 95
defect

Tracking

()

VERIFIED DUPLICATE of bug 4814

People

(Reporter: johng, Assigned: buster)

References

()

Details

Attachments

(2 files)

Check out this XML page by Tim Bray and notice that the layout of the text to the left of the 2nd text box ("Setting Your Server Up for XML") is wrong. Specifically, there is no text there at all - it begins below this right justified box, which is not the intent. I'm using Netscape build 0324, viewer, on Win95
Assignee: troy → nisheeth
Nisheeth, can you take a look and determine whether it's an XML problem or just a regular oldlayout problem. If it's a regular layout problem, a small sample would help
I'll let Nisheeth look into it further, but it looks like a layout problem to me.
Status: NEW → ASSIGNED
Target Milestone: M4
Accepting bug and setting milestone to M4...
Target Milestone: M4 → M5
Moving bug to M5...
Assignee: nisheeth → kipp
Status: ASSIGNED → NEW
Target Milestone: M5 → M6
So, this is definitely a layout problem. I've reduced the test case to its bare minimum and am attaching it to this bug report. Re-assigning this to Kipp and setting target milestone to M6. If you load the test case up in IE5 and compare with viewer, you'll notice that, for some reason, there is extra vertical whitespace between the "Next Title" and the "First Title" sections.
Attached file first-x.xml (deleted) —
Attached file first-x.css (deleted) —
Severity: normal → minor
Status: NEW → ASSIGNED
Target Milestone: M6 → M15
Status: ASSIGNED → RESOLVED
Closed: 25 years ago
Resolution: --- → DUPLICATE
The simplified test case works as expected; there are no errors in how we render. "Next Title" is below the "This is a test" text which has a 5pt bottom margin (approximate 3 pixels). The larger test case demonstrates what I call an "ib" bug - a block element that is a child of an inline element. Tim's style sheet doesn't define anything for "div1" therefore its "inline". I already have several bugs opened up to cover this case so I'm dup'ing this one. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 4814 ***
QA Contact: 4144 → 4110
Status: RESOLVED → VERIFIED
Verifying this a dup of #4814 in regards to the issue of a block element that is a child of an inline element.
You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.

Attachment

General

Created:
Updated:
Size: