Leverage Offline capabilities to make sending email appear faster (aka Send in Background, preference mailnews.sendInBackground) [meta]
Categories
(MailNews Core :: Backend, defect, P3)
Tracking
(Not tracked)
People
(Reporter: standard8, Unassigned)
References
(Depends on 14 open bugs, Blocks 7 open bugs, )
Details
(Keywords: meta, ux-efficiency, ux-interruption, Whiteboard: [gs])
User Story
Postbox has this enabled, probably for years - a shame we don't. https://support.postbox-inc.com/hc/en-us/articles/202200330-Send-in-Background user requests: https://support.mozilla.org/en-US/questions/1286288 https://support.mozilla.org/en-US/questions/1194608 https://support.mozilla.org/en-US/questions/1132511 https://support.mozilla.org/en-US/questions/1023292 https://support.mozilla.org/en-US/questions/1180441 https://support.mozilla.org/en-US/questions/1160641 https://support.mozilla.org/en-US/questions/991897 https://launchpad.net/bugs/810769 https://superuser.com/questions/777982/hide-sending-message-dialog-in-thunderbird blog posts: https://superuser.com/questions/871132/bad-side-of-enabling-sending-emails-in-the-background http://www.adriano.ws/how-to-send-email-in-the-background-with-thunderbird https://support.hollandcomputers.com/kb/a104/why-does-email-i-send-seem-to-take-a-long-time-to-leave-my-outbox.aspx https://commons.lbl.gov/display/google/Thunderbird+configuration+for+Gmail https://www.summet.com/blog/2015/11/16/making-thunderbird-send-messages-in-the-background-like-outlook/comment-page-1/ http://durofy.com/thunderbird-background-outlook/
Attachments
(1 file, 1 obsolete file)
(deleted),
patch
|
standard8
:
review+
|
Details | Diff | Splinter Review |
Reporter | ||
Updated•15 years ago
|
Updated•15 years ago
|
Comment 1•15 years ago
|
||
Comment 3•15 years ago
|
||
Comment 4•15 years ago
|
||
Comment 5•14 years ago
|
||
Comment 6•14 years ago
|
||
Reporter | ||
Updated•13 years ago
|
Comment 7•13 years ago
|
||
Comment 8•13 years ago
|
||
Comment 9•13 years ago
|
||
Updated•13 years ago
|
Comment hidden (off-topic) |
Comment hidden (off-topic) |
Comment 13•13 years ago
|
||
Comment 14•13 years ago
|
||
Comment 15•13 years ago
|
||
Comment hidden (off-topic) |
Reporter | ||
Updated•12 years ago
|
Reporter | ||
Comment 18•12 years ago
|
||
Reporter | ||
Updated•12 years ago
|
Reporter | ||
Updated•12 years ago
|
Reporter | ||
Comment 20•12 years ago
|
||
Reporter | ||
Comment 21•12 years ago
|
||
Updated•11 years ago
|
Updated•10 years ago
|
Comment hidden (obsolete) |
Updated•9 years ago
|
Comment 24•8 years ago
|
||
Comment 25•7 years ago
|
||
Updated•6 years ago
|
Updated•5 years ago
|
Updated•5 years ago
|
Comment 27•4 years ago
|
||
The "lack of interest" by users is perhaps because most users don't know it's possible to do this. The lack of progress in a decade on the blocking bugs of course doesn't help.
ISTM we only need to fix a couple bugs to make this good enough to send out for wider testing. What do others think?
Perhaps a good starting point is Bug 749654? Bad message in Outbox blocks delivery of remaining messages until dialog is dismissed
Jonathan, how does Send Later deal with these issues? (or can't it?)
Comment 28•4 years ago
|
||
(In reply to Wayne Mery (:wsmwk) from comment #27)
The "lack of interest" by users is perhaps because most users don't know it's possible to do this. The lack of progress in a decade on the blocking bugs of course doesn't help.
ISTM we only need to fix a couple bugs to make this good enough to send out for wider testing. What do others think?
Having this would surely be useful to make us look and feel better.
I'm not sure how much priority it would be worth, maybe I'd prefer to fix even more basic scenarios (e.g. that after saving (downloading) an attachment to your disk, there's zero hint in the UI how to open the target location with your OS file manager, so unless you already know about Ctrl+J, you'll have to start navigating all the way to that attachment in Explorer whereas TB knows exactly where it is).
Perhaps a good starting point is Bug 749654? Bad message in Outbox blocks delivery of remaining messages until dialog is dismissed.
Bug 749654 is an excellent starting point, that nasty thing really needs fixing although it may not be in everybody's workflows.
Updated•4 years ago
|
Comment 29•4 years ago
|
||
Send Later doesn't deal with this in any way, as far as I'm aware. It just puts messages into Outbox and then calls the API endpoint to tell Thunderbird to deliver the messages in the Outbox.
Note that Jonathan Perry-Houts is the new maintainer of Send Later as of TB78. I'm mostly a bystander at this point.
Comment 30•4 years ago
|
||
I think to give decent feedback in cases where there are problems, bug 1675978 is a prerequisite.
Updated•4 years ago
|
Reporter | ||
Comment 31•3 years ago
|
||
(In reply to Wayne Mery (:wsmwk) from comment #27)
ISTM we only need to fix a couple bugs to make this good enough to send out for wider testing. What do others think?
Generally send in background worked fine when we first implemented it, however, there were two big issues that we never solved at the time:
- the user's expectations around what happens to unsent messages at shutdown
- the potential dataloss issues at shutdown (e.g. if a message fails to be copied to a folder on shutdown, what should happen?).
Many of the blocking bugs are related to these two big issues, and these were what blocked it from being enabled 10 or so years ago. They need careful thinking about and the various possible routes examining.
iirc, handling some of this on shutdown wasn't easy to do when we looked at it many years ago (e.g. bug 459376). That may have changed now.
Comment 32•2 years ago
|
||
Just tried enabling mailnews.sendInBackground
in TB 102, the mail was put in Outbox in local folders, but not sent until I requested to specifically send it. Is that the expected behavior? I was online when I sent the message.
Updated•2 years ago
|
Comment 33•2 years ago
|
||
(In reply to Vincent Bernat from comment #32)
Just tried enabling
mailnews.sendInBackground
in TB 102, the mail was put in Outbox in local folders, but not sent until I requested to specifically send it. Is that the expected behavior? I was online when I sent the message.
IF you held the shift key down when doing send, then yes, that is an explicit "Send later".
Description
•