Closed Bug 60744 Opened 24 years ago Closed 24 years ago

[RFE] App-level mail proxy (SMTP, IMAP, POP)

Categories

(MailNews Core :: Networking, enhancement, P3)

enhancement

Tracking

(Not tracked)

VERIFIED INVALID

People

(Reporter: benc, Assigned: sspitzer)

References

Details

per ben bucksch in 56291... benc, can you file a new bug (and cc me) about the "normal" news proxying, to which you object? We could later mark it WONTFIX, but I'd like to see this evaluated - I didn't think thought it, but it doesn't seem like a bad idea to me. (I don't like connection-, but application-oriented proxies.) --- My personal feeling is that we need circuit-level proxy support (i.e, SSL Tunneling and SOCKS) support for mail-protocols (SMTP, IMAP, POP). I have reservations against implementing application-level support for mail protocols: 1- I have no idea what specification would guide us here. (I could be wrong here, so I'm going to research this more...) 2- Unlike a web or ftp network requirement (which is one to many), you point to a specific server. If network admins want a specific sub-set of the network to be firewalled, they know it's their job to set up a local SMTP host and IMAP/POP proxy to extend the service cloud into the firewalled area. It would be better to implement MX support for outbound SMTP. 3- No real audience: I can't think of any sensible customer that asked me this when I worked for Netscape Server Technical Support. (If I'm wrong here, let me know). 4- Implementation likely to have bad ROI. SOCKS and SSL Tunnel should be done first, because it is missing RFC and defacto standard implementations. I've moved all my non-IM bugzilla work to a non-netscape account, so I can separate "work" from legitimate open contributions. In that light, I'm stridently pushing for Mozilla to implement and re-enforce existing Proxy technologies and standards. If someone wants to start creating "new law" in the Proxy land, they are going to need a proxy code on the server side to make it work. Only a proxy server vendor (like iPlanet) could suggest this, and they would need a working prototype of the server to go with it.
Status: UNCONFIRMED → NEW
Ever confirmed: true
There are no standards in this area. It should be closed WONTFIX.
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 24 years ago
Resolution: --- → INVALID
I've always hated that joke that people use when they do really bad things over networks and they say: "The best part about standards is that there are so many to choose from." Let's not encourage someone to write a standard for something that is pretty useless. RESOLVED/INVALID
Blocks: 23728
linking to meta bug on proxy support for mailnews module.
Status: RESOLVED → VERIFIED
QA Contact: esther → benc
Product: MailNews → Core
-> mailnews: networking (since proxy bugs in (Necko) Networking go to the generic-named component.
Component: Networking: News → MailNews: Networking
Product: Core → MailNews Core
You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.