Closed
Bug 6186
Opened 25 years ago
Closed 25 years ago
[pp]Modal windows don't work
Categories
(Core :: XUL, defect, P3)
Tracking
()
VERIFIED
FIXED
M9
People
(Reporter: slogan, Assigned: slogan)
Details
Modal windows not implemented for Gtk+. Parity issue with windows/mac.
Status: ASSIGNED → RESOLVED
Closed: 25 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Fixes checked in. Should behave same as windows platform.
syd, could you provide a testcase, or mark this verified if you know it works?
thanks
Test case for Linux:
Bring up preferences. Try clicking in other places of Apprunner, e.g., menu bar,
buttons, etc., outside of prefs dialog. If nothing responds, the prefs dialog is
modal.
ok, so modal windows work in all ways but one (please correct me if i'm wrong):
in nova, when you check you bring up preferences, the parent window is ALWAYS
behind the prefs. try as you might, you'll never bring the parent to the
foreground.
in seamonkey, this is not the case. the parent is 100% defunct while prefs are
open (which is good), but you can bring the parent to the foreground.
i think that is bad from a user experience standpoint. should this be reopened,
or is that the correct behavior?
syd, i'm tempted to reopen this bug. try opening the preferences. then
close the parent window. poof, it disappears, while the prefs stay open
and responsive. i know that can't be right. is that a separate bug?
Well, this doesn't sound to me like we are violating the modality of the prefs
window. What is the expected behaviour in this case?
you shouldn't be able to close the parent of a modal window.
try it in communicator on any platform. open the prefs dialog and do whatever
you can to get the parent window in front of the prefs dialog. it can't be done.
then try to close the parent windows without closing the prefs dialog. also
impossible. this might not be your problem, but it is a bug. should i file
it as a new one?
Reopen this bug open. I was tracking the functionality of Windows (e.g. 95, NT)
modality which appears now to be application modal (at one point, you could go
and select menu items and such from the top level window). This has changed, and
it looks like we need to sync up the Linux story.
Status: RESOLVED → REOPENED
Summary: Modal windows don't work → [pp]Modal windows don't work
Whiteboard: waiting for developer feedback
Comment 10•25 years ago
|
||
reopening bug.
New Problem:
On RedHat Linux 5.2 kernel 2.2.9, modal windows are _almost_ modal.
The parent window must not be allowed to stay in the foreground.
[not a problem on mac/win32]
On MacOS 8.51, modal windows are truly modal. The only problem is
mouseover events are still sent to (and received by) toolbars and
buttons. They are not clickable, but appear to be.
[not a problem in linux/win32]
Builds Tested:
1999-07-14-16 RedHat Linux 5.2 kernel 2.2.9
1999-07-14-17 WinNT 4.0 sp4
1999-07-14-16 MacOS 8.51
Assignee | ||
Comment 11•25 years ago
|
||
Moving to M9.
Status: REOPENED → RESOLVED
Closed: 25 years ago → 25 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Assignee | ||
Comment 12•25 years ago
|
||
The problem isn't that the dialog isn't modal, it is. Modality does not extend
to the window decorations. So, the user can kill the toplevel window as you
described. The real problem is we are not handling the relationship between the
modal dialog and its parent. Pavlov is dealing with a bug that we are not
setting the transient-for hint for the popups (modal or not modal) correctly.
Try this on 4.x on solaris, for example. You can bring up preferences and then
(I'm using CDE as my example) go to the menu hung on the window decorations and
close the main browser window. The prefs window will go down too, this is what
we want, but it has *zero* to do with modality. Pav, perhaps you could right a
quick test app with a transient-for popup dialog and see if closing the toplevel
(transient-for) parent causes the popup to go down too (and the application to
exit). If so, then this bug is a duplicate of the bug you are working on, with
an added test case. If not, open a new bug.
Comment 13•25 years ago
|
||
so pavlov, is this a dup of your bug?
i agree that you can close communicator 4.x windows while the prefs are open,
_but_ the prefs window closes itself as communicator exits.
the last remaining issues:
1.closing the navigator window should close the open prefs window
2.the prefs window should never be allowed to hide behind it's parent window.
Status: RESOLVED → VERIFIED
Whiteboard: [1999.07.26] waiting for feedback
Comment 14•25 years ago
|
||
issue #2 is fixed, when i get around to it i'll open a bug about #1.
marking verified on
1999-08-13-08 RedHat Linux 6.0 (GNOME/enlightenment)
1999-08-13-08 WinNT 4.0 sp5
1999-08-13-08 MacOS 8.51
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•