Closed
Bug 6946
Opened 25 years ago
Closed 25 years ago
(re)flow problem with an aligned/not-aligned table setup
Categories
(Core :: Layout: Tables, defect, P3)
Tracking
()
VERIFIED
FIXED
M10
People
(Reporter: hyp-x, Assigned: mjudge)
References
Details
(Whiteboard: [TESTCASE])
Attachments
(1 file)
(deleted),
text/html
|
Details |
The 1st table in the following example is rendered using its minimal width
the first time the page is loaded (or reloaded).
It takes it's expected size only when I resize the window.
Builds tested are: M5 and 1999052208
---
<html>
<body>
<table border=3 align=left>
<tr><td>blablablabla blablablabla</td>
</table>
<table border=3>
<tr><td>foo</td>
</table>
</body>
</html>
Updated•25 years ago
|
Status: NEW → ASSIGNED
Target Milestone: M9
Reporter | ||
Updated•25 years ago
|
Whiteboard: [TESTCASE]
Reporter | ||
Comment 1•25 years ago
|
||
I cannot simplify the testcase any more.
I'm duplicating it as an attachment for easier viewing from the browser.
Reporter | ||
Comment 2•25 years ago
|
||
Updated•25 years ago
|
Target Milestone: M9 → M10
Comment 3•25 years ago
|
||
Moving to M11
Comment 5•25 years ago
|
||
In a more recent build (Linux 1999-08-16-08-M9) I'm seeing just a quick flash of
the incorrect state before it corrects itself.
Reporter | ||
Comment 6•25 years ago
|
||
Re: dbaron's comment
I saw the same behaviour some time ago in a Solaris build too.
I think it may be a (completly different) bug on unix (or on gtk), that it does
a superflous reflow on loading which causes the content to turn right.
On windows it happens only after I resize the window.
Reporter | ||
Comment 7•25 years ago
|
||
I'm testing this with 1999-08-30-10 on WinNT 4sp3
I came to test this when I encountered 12783 (yet another bug with left aligned
tables.), and I found I can no longer see this behaviour.
Something has clearly changed (recently) because:
1. The two tables has a few pixel space between them now.
2. If you click below the tables, the left-aligned table gets a blue one-pixel
border.
Is any of those are intentional?
Should I open another bug for case 2?
I'm not marking this worksforme yet.
Updated•25 years ago
|
Assignee: karnaze → mjudge
Status: ASSIGNED → NEW
Comment 8•25 years ago
|
||
The only remaining problem I see is the table selection issue. Michael, is this
the intended behavior.
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 25 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
yes this is intentional. if this is a "bad" thing let me know. since a "dead"
space was clicked it looks for the nearest frame to give the "click" to. the
table grabs it and it must be selecting itself. i am resolving this fixed
so someone will opens a new bug on table selection if they want
Updated•25 years ago
|
Status: RESOLVED → VERIFIED
Comment 10•25 years ago
|
||
Using 9/16 Apprunner on Win 95, Win NT, Win 98, Mac8.5 and Linux Red Hat 6.0
(Linux 2.2), verified bug fixed.
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•