Closed
Bug 7624
Opened 26 years ago
Closed 24 years ago
[LAYER] zdnet.com loads page headers and footers, but not the article text.
Categories
(Tech Evangelism Graveyard :: English US, defect, P3)
Tracking
(Not tracked)
VERIFIED
FIXED
People
(Reporter: cpeterso, Assigned: bugzilla)
References
()
Details
(Keywords: testcase, verifyme, Whiteboard: [TESTCASE])
Could be an easy kill -- please take a look.
The problem seems to be TABLE related. Setting ALIGN value ( a non numeric
string ) causes table to disappear.
Here is the Reduced case:
<HTML>
<BODY>
<ILAYER>
<LAYER>
<TABLE ALIGN="LEFT" BORDER=1>
<TR>
<TD>
There
</TD>
</TR>
</TABLE>
</LAYER>
</ILAYER>
Hello
</BODY>
</HTML>
FYI: The content model looks correct.
Assigning bug to karnaze
Comment 2•25 years ago
|
||
In the above testcase, setting align = left|right cause the table to vanish, but
align = center displays properly (M7/Linux).
Updated•25 years ago
|
Whiteboard: [MAKINGTEST] Antti.Nayha@oulu.fi
Updated•25 years ago
|
Whiteboard: [MAKINGTEST] Antti.Nayha@oulu.fi
Updated•25 years ago
|
Whiteboard: [TESTCASE]
Comment 3•25 years ago
|
||
Verified that this is reduced as much as possible.
Updated•25 years ago
|
Status: NEW → ASSIGNED
Target Milestone: M9
Updated•25 years ago
|
Assignee: karnaze → vidur
Status: ASSIGNED → NEW
Target Milestone: M9 → M10
Comment 4•25 years ago
|
||
The table is visible in the attachment, but I'm not sure it is correct; when I
remove the layers it looks ok. The url looks very bad, probably due to the
layers. Vidur, if I'm wrong, please reassign to me.
Updated•25 years ago
|
Assignee: vidur → troy
Comment 5•25 years ago
|
||
Yes, this is a layers layout issue, probably related to the LAYER inside the
ILAYER. Assigning to Troy, with the risk that it may be marked WONTFIX or
reassigned to ekrock.
Eric, assigning to you.
As I understand it our current policy is to support LAYER and ILAYER but not
with the DOM? I don't see the sense in doing that. We'll still end up with most
pages that use LAYER not displaying correctly
Another issue is what to do about LAYER specific attributes that don't map to
CSS? For example, PAGEX and PAGEY? It's a lot of work to implement that
The third concern I have is that layers aten't compatible with CSS2 positioning.
Things like 'auto' for height don't behave the same. Layers treat that like the
height shrink wraps, but CSS2 doesn't. See the CSS2 spec for details
I think if we're going to do layers then we need to do it right. And that means
someone spending the time to do qualify what that means.
Updated•25 years ago
|
Status: NEW → ASSIGNED
Comment 7•25 years ago
|
||
Accepting for now; we're reviewing the question of LAYER and ILAYER. Agree
completely that there's no point in doing a bad implementation of LAYER/ILAYER,
and that it should be done right or not at all.
Updated•25 years ago
|
Summary: zdnet.com loads page headers and footers, but not the article text. → [LAYER] zdnet.com loads page headers and footers, but not the article text.
Comment 8•25 years ago
|
||
Marking [LAYER] in summary.
Updated•25 years ago
|
Target Milestone: M10 → M13
Comment 9•25 years ago
|
||
Moving to M13. Want to evangelize site revision to them by beta. Following up
through Catherine Corre of PR (corre@netscape.com)
Comment 10•25 years ago
|
||
*** Bug 15964 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 11•25 years ago
|
||
*** Bug 15896 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 12•25 years ago
|
||
*** Bug 13617 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 13•25 years ago
|
||
*** Bug 16727 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 14•25 years ago
|
||
*** Bug 16143 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 15•25 years ago
|
||
*** Bug 16728 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 16•25 years ago
|
||
I marked bug 16728. It reported that scrollbar fail to appear for www.zdnet.com.
I tried to load the page, and nothing was drawn on screen. However, I could
still click on things.
Updated•25 years ago
|
Status: ASSIGNED → RESOLVED
Closed: 25 years ago
Resolution: --- → INVALID
Comment 17•25 years ago
|
||
ZDNet has been notified. Closing this bug and marking INVALID. We will
doubtless keep getting many DUPs until this is fixed.
Updated•25 years ago
|
Status: RESOLVED → VERIFIED
Comment 18•25 years ago
|
||
Marking as verified invalid
Comment 19•25 years ago
|
||
Looks like we'll stop getting hoards of bugs about zdnet and their affiliates.
My 1999121608 WinNT build works fine. So hopefully they fixed their site.
Comment 20•24 years ago
|
||
Moving all [LAYER] bugs to Evangelism component for tracking and open-source
evangelism by mozilla community members of sites that need to upgrade to support
web standards such as HTML 4.0 (instead of LAYER/ILAYER) and the W3C DOM
(instead of Nav4 document.layers[] or IE document.all()). Sites should be
lobbied to do the upgrade using the email templates that are linked to from
http://www.mozilla.org/newlayout/bugathon.html#layerbugs . When a site's owner
has confirmed receipt of the message requesting an upgrade, the bug should be
marked with the keyword evangelized to indicate that evangelism for that bug is
complete. When the site finishes the upgrade and supports standards, the bug
should be closed.
Assignee: ekrock → nobody
Status: VERIFIED → NEW
Component: Layout → Evangelism
Keywords: evangwanted
QA Contact: petersen → nobody
Target Milestone: M13 → ---
Comment 21•24 years ago
|
||
Closing all Evangelism bugs where no evangelism is needed because page has been
fixed, site is internal to Netscape, report is a DUP, or bug report is no longer
appropriate for evangelism for any other reason.
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 25 years ago → 24 years ago
Comment 22•24 years ago
|
||
SPAM:Changing QA contact on 111 evang bugs as I am now the new QA contact for
this component.
Sorry about the spam
zach
QA Contact: nobody → zach
Assignee | ||
Comment 23•24 years ago
|
||
Reassigning Evangelism bugs to me, the component's new owner. I would like to
take this opportunity to thank nobody@mozilla.org for all of his dedication,
contributions, and hard work, and wish him luck at his new job. Thanks, nobody.
Assignee: nobody → BlakeR1234
Status: RESOLVED → NEW
Assignee | ||
Comment 24•24 years ago
|
||
workaround bugzilla problem that caused a bunch of evangelism bugs to be
NEW/INVALID, NEW/FIXED, NEW/WORKSFORME or NEW/DUPLICATE
Resolution: INVALID → ---
Comment 25•24 years ago
|
||
*** Bug 20805 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 26•24 years ago
|
||
This site has been fixed now. Marking fixed. Adding some keywords in the
interest of tracking.
Assignee | ||
Updated•24 years ago
|
Keywords: evangwanted
Comment 28•23 years ago
|
||
All Evangelism Bugs are now in the Product Tech Evangelism. See bug 86997 for
details.
Component: Evangelism → US English
Product: Browser → Tech Evangelism
Version: other → unspecified
Updated•10 years ago
|
Product: Tech Evangelism → Tech Evangelism Graveyard
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•